So I played 10,000 hands this week, which is a lot to me. Overall I'm happy, having finally reversed the downward trend, but nevertheless I feel that it remains fragile. Until today, everything went well, I was able to take the bad beats on me (several sessions initiated by the loss of a cellar in the first 10 hands and finally largely positive). But today, I again cracked trouble supporting several dirty tricks and cons of fish ironing agro hyper mode which only sees his cards and forget take the time to put the fish on a range. Result, a session to close at -140 € 10k hands this series.
So, the week ends with a gain of 333 €, nothing transcendent ...
Then I have good news and bad news: I'm really over this time the EV! ... This is good news, because it was very long and it confirms to me a change of not unpleasant time after nearly 5 months to years runner light under the EV. But it is both bad news because it means I've been rather fortunate, therefore there is no evidence that I'm back able to win even NL50 ...
But here's the curve of the week:
two notable things:
- The mountain environment: A session that has incredibly good start (I was at € 290 after an hour, and still + € 200 after two hours) and I wanted to do (too) last. In principle, my sessions last between 1:30 and 2 am because I feel beyond a need to take a break. Here I thought I had to play longer because it went well. Result: At the end of the session of 3 hours, I posted ... a loss of 9 €. Annoying, and I promised myself not to exceed two hours game without a break ...
- The chance that saves me at the end. My last two sessions were very bad: -475 € EV accrued. But I do not lose that 123 real dollars ... Or when cracked KK with AA KK and AK saves the week. Well, honestly, I do not sulk my pleasure to be back on the good side of bad beat, I had forgotten how enjoyable it is ... At the time, because at the end of the session, when we look at the curve, as it leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.
Let's take a look at my stats:
| Size | Hands | bb/100 | VPIP% | PFR% | Agg | WTSD% | W$SD% |
| 6 max | 10197 | 7.14 | 24.5 | 18.9 | 4.01 | 26.4 | 53.8 |
| 3Bet% | 4Bet Range | vs 3Bet Call% | Flop vs Raise Fold% |
| 9.0 | 2.4 | 34.4 | 42.7 |
| Flop Turn CBET CBET | %% | Flop Fold CBET | vs. vs. Turn Fold CBET |
| 72.7 46.4 67.3 | 41.7 |
7 BB/100, nothing to climb the curtain, especially knowing that they are due mainly to a good run. Agg a factor in the rise, due to a game much more aggressive with big hands. A WTSD up, as the W $ SD, which just shows to me that I meet better situations than in previous periods. 3bet rate increased slightly, mainly due to the fact a lot less flat call with hands like KQ or AJ/A10 / KJ / QJ and more often choose between fold and 3bet. Rate vs. Fold CBET always very important, I did not want to give too much too fast bluffs in my game during this period of reconstruction ...
So which hands I spew? It seems that especially the big pairs cost me dearly. Besides, I had 44 pairs of AA, which in total cost me € 26! Not a big loss, but are we not supposed to make money with the best starting hand?
So today, I offer a selection of my big shots with big pairs lost without overcard the board. I'll spare you the kind of bad beats all in PF or all-in turn with 90% equity, which does not exhibit much interest and am pleased to submit the shots where there was certainly a way to limit the damage ... I think I tend to overplay these overpairs to reach carpet face TPTK ovp or less, probably a strategic mistake against a good player (in front of a fish that will pay 3 barrels with 88 on board 6224J, I think my technique is good).
Some overplayed overpairs
The hand that annoys me most
On another subject, here is the hand that prevents me most of sleep:
What a mess! He is a player rather LAG not very good, very large genus ratio (volume corones) / (volume of brain). It must be here on allin on the river, since it will pay our vBET with the ace and he will not be so easy for him to drop the pot in which it is almost split on ... Nothing that you write, I still have nausea, how do I have missed this spot?
I said to the attention of my coach that I do pay more in general with Broadway but there I found 3 good reasons to call:
- I've often 3bet and it almost never fold So here is a 3bet insurance play a big pot with a marginal hand OOP
- The size of the stimulus that is not really expensive to go
see the flop - I am suited, so it seems to me that the hand not play too badly against his flop wide range
End of tournament
The last hand I am proposing today is a hand of tournament . I almost finally get a result last night but unfortunately it stopped too quickly on the next hand ...
Context: TF € 100 a tournament, we are 7 players, I'll let you see the stacks on the replay. I have already secured a gain of 600 €, the next higher level is not negligible since it moves at about 900 €, but that's not what interests me, I is the Top3 and if possible wins (4500 €) ... The table is rather strong and very aggressive, it 3bet-4-bet a lot, sizing and with thoughtful, in short, it will not be easy to climb without experiencing favorable. Little info on the player at BB, all I know is that earlier, we were already in battle and it blinds me 3bet.
Given his stack (13bb), the most logical move for me would be to make carpets. That's what I would do here with most of my hands, but I thought that AQ was strong enough that I'm happy to pay his 3bet allin, accepting the risk of losing quite often 60/40 or 70/30 likely. I confess I had not thought one second a call from him with such a stack (pay seems really played horribly wrong on his part, what do you think?), And I am very annoyed when I realize I play that gave him the opportunity to make the choice that bothers me the most. The rest is anecdotal, a dream flop for me, so now I go out a few hands later with AQ against AK. But on unfavorable flop, I had an unpleasant choice between abandoning the shot or take a huge risk OOP ... So no luck, or should I have to be less greedy and carpet?
0 comments:
Post a Comment