Friday, December 31, 2010

Doral Tires Where Are They Made



On the last day of 2010, is also the 4th month of this challenge ending.

In terms of results, it is still not ecstasy, but as each month since the start of the challenge, there is an increase from the previous month, since beyond this time the 2k € (2086 € vs € 1,576 in November.) Note that for the first time we could not count on significant bonus (110 € only, vs. € 910 in November), who toured the rooms offer a bonus easy to clear (Winamax Fulltilt and for not name), so it will require just a bit of rakeback to be paid in ten days ...

The very positive point for the month of December, it will be seen as a step further result in a cash game, finally returning with the winning side (it was after nearly six months of consecutive side Dark Force ...)

In terms of volume, I managed to almost keep pace with November (199 vs. 205 hours in total), and still without an overdose, with the exception of a small passage empty a few days before Christmas, quickly passed through a day of rest and a much smaller volume for a few days.

Let a little each month as the tour of our three business units ...


Cash game online

In terms of volume, we note an increasing number of hours (95 hours vs. 89 hours in November), but a number of hands down (31k vs 35k), which clearly choose to limit myself to 4 tables and were almost never ignored this rule.

As for results, the upturn in the second half of November was well supported during the month of December, which was completed in 1658 €. For a first positive month since this challenge is launched, it is not so bad, especially since most of the hands has been played NL50. And then I took a good lead over my budget from mid-December (you know, the one who sees me win € 50k in cash by the end of the challenge - well, I know, it was not the most difficult month in terms of goals:))

I clearly rather "runner good" on the month, making up a small part of my gap vs. EV curve.

Curiously, if the winrate end of the month is a small 6.1 BB/100, we have a huge imbalance between the two limits that I played (I gradually retried on the shoots of NL100 in mid-month, increasing more share NL100 on the last days):
- 17.9 in 8000 BB/100 hands NL100
- 2.2 BB/100 over 23,000 hand NL50

Then of course, no hasty conclusion. Most of this gap stems from the fact that I had a good badrun on late NL50 (lots of bad set-up, run well below the EV, causing a big drop in my winrate that revolved around 7 until Christmas), while it was still very well happen in NL100. (Yes, I know, it's cool that it had to happen in that sense:))

However, there is one thing I am convinced: The level is not higher than 50 NL100 , we find the same proportion of fish ...

And I especially have in recent days for printing much more control over my tables, especially in NL100. My readings of the players become more refined, which allowed me to reintroduce a lot of bluff reasoned in my game (which I had cleaned during my difficult moments NL50), and also less weakitude (I was gradually become very easy to bluff, I am now again trust my reads on the players). While my non-showdown curve value remains negative, but with a much gentler slope, which is very pleasant in terms of feel when playing.

All this makes for January I decided to iron completely NL100, without waiting for fulfilled the goals I set for myself for NL50. This will allow me (hopefully) speed up my ascent to the NL200. But I still think there is a big difference in level between NL100 and NL200, and I do not expect to do shots of retrying too fast: I have a little more than 3000 € to return before have achieved what I set when I was back down in NL100, which should be enough to deal in January! Visit the NL200 month of February ...


online MTT

is the big disappointment of the month with a total lack of results if we except the qualifying for the finals of FPT ... 77 MTT played (against 74 in November) for a buy-in from 34 € average down slightly vs. November, I have only 14% of ITM (against 22% in November). The rate of ITM I have no problem (on the contrary, I want to say, so it is rare that the big performers in MTT have ITM rates beyond 15%), except that no perfs have never come: 3 small TF only (excluding satellites), only 1 small podium (on a buy-in very poor), and in the end it saves ... € 93 within 72 hours of play, here's a job that pays well! The fault

to 3 factors:
- A number of these were played MTT LAG Spewer mode when I felt a kind of weariness a Sunday evening (a little silly mess)
- A TF earlier this month particularly poorly negotiated and which was the subject of a specific article
- The few best tournaments in which I run deep and that could lead to a nice perf have most often ended on a very ugly shot at 20 or 30 left ...

Come on, it will go better in 2011!


Game Live

I played a lot in it I live it compared to previous months. Many more opportunities simply, that led me to spend about 32 hours real tables:
- 3 MTT casino, for any loss ITM and
of 640 € - 1 S G & Casino for a loss of 45 €
- 4 M & G private low buy-ins (10 or 20 €) for a 2nd place and a loss of 40 €
- 1 S & G's private challenge (50 € rebuy) that I win, for a net gain of 950 €

Let the whole, a net gain of 225 € Monthly, in which we shall not attach more importance than that given the low number of events and their imbalance in terms of buy-in ...

And that's it for this last month of 2010 ... (And no Stefal, I did not always put M & G. .. And I intend to stay Focused on the cash game, so I'm not sure this will change in 2011).

I wish you all a great Christmas Eve (without poker I hope!) And offer my best wishes for 2011.

Do you know that according to the Chinese calendar, 2011 is the Year of the Rabbit White Metal? If I win 100,000 € 1 coins in 2011, making a lot of white metal, I will disguise myself as a Playboy Bunny for the next eve ...

Recover Brain Cells After Use Of Weed

Happy New Year!


Happy New Year to you all (all?) To you who follow my blog for a long time or who you are just passing through. I wish you full of good things, love, laughter, joy, clothes ...
I take this opportunity to thank you for your comments that make me great pleasure (you do not realize) that you continue to follow my blog that is not used much (apart blablater and yes I am a daughter, a hard-hahaha).
May this year be provided for you and me, full of good surprises, projects accomplished, success, gossip with girlfriends, shopping, great events.
I sincerely hope to see you all at Fashion Week in Casablanca in May because it would make me really happy you meet (in real hahhaa) and if you need information about it let me know, I will answer your questions.
Again thank you and Happy New Year, enjoy (and stay sober huh)!

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Full View Brazilian Wax

I'd like to talk about ...

(instead of) British Fashion Awards!
For those who do not know what it is, it's a ceremony that takes place every year in the United States (Long live the Queen!) which is intended to award prizes to glamorous celebrities in various fields.
It is held annually in February during London Fashion Week.
And since 2010 is over and there is no more than two months before the next, why not make a little summary?

1 #
4 times winner of the title "British Designer of the year," called the price " CFB Outstanding Achievement in Fashion Design " (I do not find the exact translation but basically he was rewarded for his amazing creations) was awarded to Alexander McQueen (rest his soul) in honor of his extraordinary career.


2 #
Alexa Chung was chosen by the public to receive the award for 'British Style '

3 #
Nicola Formichetti is a stylist, a photographer, a makeup (make-up artist) and artistic director. He is the designer of Lady Gaga. He was awarded the "The Isabella Blow Award for Fashion Creator .


4 #
Naomi Campbell has been awarded "Special Recognition .

5 #
Burberry (So Christopher Baaaaailey !) has been awarded the "Digital Innovation " for airing all his shows online since September 2009.

6 #
Price "Emerging Talent " (category ready-to-wear ) went to Meadham Kirchhoff.




7 #
After being voted 'The girl oh the Year' by Vogue Magazine, and have been ranked No. 1 in February by Site models.com, Lara Stone received the award for 'Model 2010 '


8 #
The creative director of Celine, Phoebe Philo was awarded the prestigious' Designer of the Year '

9 #
the price for "Designer Brand 2010" was awarded to Mulberry ( Emma Hill).


10 #
Price " Emerging Talent" (in the accessories category this time) goes Husam El Odeh .



11 #
Patrick Grant has been awarded the 'Menswear Designer ' for his label E. Tautz .


12 #
Having previously won the "Emerging Talent " this year is attributed to Nicholas Kirkwood price " Accessory Designer .

Now talk about those left empty-handed hahahha!


We saw Emma Roberts and Ella Harris fleeing photographers.

We met Daisy Lowe in her beautiful dress.

And then there was Twiggy too.

Kelly Brook posed for us.

Claudia Schiffer was (again) radiant.

VV Brown came with her ugly shoes.

(My love always) Douglas Booth.

Jeff Banks.


Johnny Borrel (which looks totally stuffed) and Edie Campbell.

Bianca Jagger
(former wife of Mick Jagger good mom and the beautiful Georgia Jagger)


Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Letter To A Judge Regarding Community Service

We redid the game - Post Mortem

took me some time to come back because nothing is mine the job ...

I wish I had more answers in the comments, for further analysis of the hands etc but I realize that 10 hands maybe a lot ... The next time you try with fewer hands. However a lot of votes directly into the replayer, I hope this little quiz you will be amused ...


Makes 1

the 113 votes, the result is clamped between 3 options: check (39%) - but alas it is not known if the intention to call or fold if of the opponent's river bet, bet (35%) and all-in (24%). Note 3 votes for option fold that does not seem very
listed :-) For my part, I bet 36 €, or half the pot, I could see a pair (1010/JJ) and hoped to have more opportunities to charge me with a small bet by his hand is a bluff that starting flying carpet. Here, only those choosing the option check-fold (or fold-line option:)) came to save € 79 ...




Makes 2

Like a clear majority (65% of 72 votes), I decided to cut my losses and not to extend my bluff, the they have very little chance of success against such a player and in view of his stack. The 19% who chose to bet € 20 will lose more, because I can not imagine a second that he does not call here. As said by one commentator spot was not right for a 2nd barrel bluff, to avoid facing a shortstack. A note here another 15% (11 votes anyway!) Who prefer folder rather than showing their hand and sometimes (not often, I grant you) win at showdown ...




Makes 3

As the majority (52% of 54 votes), I paid this minraise loser. Yet it is without doubt a situation where he would learn to fold despite the enormous coast ... Although it was a little difficult to see what hand with a 9 has been able to call on the flop (quoique. ago .. all 9x suited to tile ...), what can it be other than 9 to revive the river? 37% of voters cast their hand wisely, congratulations to them. The 11% who raise (or go all-in), I suggest you temper your fervor, you'd better be a little kiki rich, but broke that severely burn ...




Makes 4

This hand is probably the one that has most divided the panel of voters: Out of 44 votes, 54% and 46% call fold. I was part of the narrow majority, which allows me to reveal the hand of naughty ...



is well on the anonymous commentator (who in the passage made me laugh, I do not know if it was voluntary or not) who was right on this hand: If I bet a lot bigger on the flop and still very heavy on the turn, because I knew if I was ahead or not (if I was to fold it, and if I'm paid because I'm behind :))... This revolutionary technique would certainly have helped save me from this river well ugly. Well, no, nothing at all, I regret nothing, when I put it to be less well paid, not to have an info or to scare away the hands that have 2 outs ... The time one of these 2 fit outs, well, that's poker ...


Makes 5

Out of 34 votes (I wonder how I will of voters to 10 hand, lol), the call and the raise are exactly equal to 44% each. The rest are timid who choose to fold. I personally just call, congratulations to those who raisent (and in particular bringing rAAise its name and read the hand perfectly ugly) ...




Makes 6

As an overwhelming majority (66% of 41 voters), I fold here. Call 29% and 5% raise. To answer rAAise on why the play on the flop: I defend very few hands in the blinds: pairs, QA, and ... that's about all. Every once in a while (rarely), I call with a suited broadway. Then, usually, or I hit (combo set or draw) and it's party, or give up. It happens from time to time to make a move on the flop with a hand that has little equity to vary my game (and make the call PF a bit more profitable). It is in this case here, where I have a gutshot I am ready to give up to 4-bet when villain. I avoid the check-up call, especially as here against an aggressive opponent that will in any case continue to put pressure on me the following streets.
So basically, it's either I take the hit on the flop if he has nothing, or I give up, unless my card miraculous happens. I'm not saying it played well and also 9 / 10 times I either fold or be revived PF fold the flop. But here in any case the explanation of the move ;-)




Makes 7

Of the 39 voters, only 20% are cautious enough to check here, the rest divided between those who bet (44%) and those who go all in (36%), which amounts to roughly the same as it seems impossible not to raise the pay of ugly ... To meet again rAAise, however there is indeed a standard play for me to return with a raise after sc, a fortiori if it is already a multiway pot. As you say, it is clear that there is often forced to abandon her 3 blinds on a squeeze ... I have not yet had the opportunity to do but go in my tracker analyze what happens, they call the cut-off with sc. The fact is that I am almost over already know the answer, which lead me to conclude that the sc will be played as button! Thank you for drawing my attention to this point.
The other interesting aspect of this hand (play beyond the flop ridiculous that I still can not explain), that once again it is useless to bet less than carpet when we managed to create a pot of good size, if he had an inferior hand to mine I would have lost a little value here because of course he never revived ...




Makes 8

Only 9% of 33 voters have found a Fold here. Not much to cope with the set on a board and also against an opponent drawY aggro. Further to comment rAAise I thank him again for his very complete answer, I confirm that this is not a standard play for me 3bet KQ. Let's just say that when I am left with a lag (one that plays well, eh, not a maniac), I try to increase my rates 3bet position to exploit the fact that too much stimulus (here 30% it is huge, though) one hand and to create a dynamic that leads him to face 4-bet my good hands later on the other. So of course I am with what I have, while trying to take hands with a bit of equity post-flop (83o I avoid, what): Axs, KXS, J9, etc. ... Then KQ, or worse than K5s J10?
It's rare that a player like this simply call with AK / AQ (I think these hands are clearly part of its range of 4-bet for value against a player like me who 3bet much) so I do 'm not often dominated with KQ. So, I do not understand why this would be a worse hand than another for a 3bet light and would love to read more arguments about this.

I can not reveal the villain's hand on the replay, but he had good pocket 6.




Makes 9

With 38% of 34 voters, I found that the situation merited vBET here (being well prepared to give up on the case I would be unlikely or raise). I think it would vBET a Q and is therefore probably of 1010 or a lower pair (type 77). I think it will be difficult for him not to pay me if 1010, and therefore the game is worth it, even though I seemed very close. And besides, 59% do not take that risk and chose a wise check. They lose a little value, but it's true that I tend to vBET enough light on patterns of weakness (check-call, check-check, check) and sometimes I'm having a tricky-player liabilities which had slowplay his set from the beginning ... I will not return to the fold player here, he must have big fingers or a sight problem ...
To respond to points raised by Redge and rAAise respectively advocating a raise on the flop or 3bet PF: The player in question is relatively tight (PFR 16), it is utg and it almost never call 3bet (4-bet or fold - 20% anyway). As I do not like the idea of 3bet to fold a huge pair of DD, nor that of 5bet all in a thin pair of JJ, I choose to just call and take advantage of the post-flop position, ready to hand to go after in the case where a squeezer wake up and make our folder utg raiser. The flop is just the same problem, I do not want to have to give up on a reraise that could come from both hands that beat me hands that I beat. My

hh contains no villain's hand, but I think I remember that it was a pair of 1010 as planned ...



Makes 10


only 33 votes and no fold (I think I know what is the player we have lost the hand between 9 and 10 hand:) The overwhelming majority (79%) is like me and cracks over weak-line passive chosen from the beginning against the good reg aggressive betting. We do not know what he would do in case of new check, but the carnival is all I think part of its range and so I have regretted not having had the guts to continue to make him want to I put pressure ... Congratulations to the 21% who dare to check, they probably would not take anything more in most cases, but were given another chance against our play that is too large to pass against a player responsible, what was clearly the case here. With over stack, another possibility would have been an honest bet shy, but now it does not work ...


Saturday, December 25, 2010

Best Clothing For Snowmobiling

We wish you a merry Christmas, We wish you a merry christmas! (And a happy new year)






Merry Christmas!








Merry Christmas !





(I have not got my gift, but I remain convinced that one day I would end get them in! )

Friday, December 24, 2010

Custom Bmxs For Under 100 Pounds

Santa exists ...

... I met him!

It has been 40 years that tells me that Santa is very busy during the few days before Christmas. It handles so-called enormous logistical problems since its platform in the North, organizing the delivery of billions of packets worldwide, with precision and timing to dream any employee of DHL or Fedex.

And Ben was lied to. I crossed a lot these days, and I can tell you it was not working wooden toys ... But where was he then? Ben at the poker tables, of course!

So yes, I should not have found me because I was supposed to take a break. That's what I did: no MTT in the last 3 days, just a few hands of cash in the day to maintain ... Barely three days in 3000 hands, and it was a shame to deny it since it was my best hands since 3000 this challenge is launched, and by far ... And Father Christmas, then? Well, I've crossed a lot to my tables, the small secretive ...

Sometimes deal:



But more often it was installed at tables, like any player ... Ah yes, but I have acknowledged, there are certain details that do not lie ...





Other times, he disguised himself in flop




You see? All we told you all these years is a big lie ... I know it's ugly ... And besides, I feel that I will participate in its spread, although I discovered the awful truth. Still a bit forced, no? You see me take my youngest (3yrs old) and say

"Come over here my man, I'll mention the wonderful story of Santa Claus.
- Oh yes, Daddy!
- Once Upon a Time in the Far North a very nice old gentleman with a long white beard. For hundreds of years, he had the happiness to many little kids like you ... Provided they are well behaved, he passed by the chimney of their house at night and just bring lots of gifts
- It's great, I love me Santa Claus! This is the night that will come to us, huh, Dad?
- Ah, my son, you know, it's not that simple. One day he got sick, so he sold his sleigh and reindeer and he got himself a brand new PC and an excellent connection to 8MB. And he decided to switch customers ... So he opened a poker site and moved the tables. He spotted Lengcentka Chal, who had been very good this year and who had sent him a nice letter: Dear Dad

Christmas

This year I was very wise, but I have not had much luck. Me what I want for Christmas is a beautiful goodrun, kind of 45 BB/100 hands in 3000, y'know? You think you could do this for me?

[Big Voice Mode ON]

HO HO HO! Come on, it's true, that it was well-behaved boy. But it is not very smart, he continues to go allin PF with AK against big pairs. Go, look, this time he will touch his Ace!

What can I do to him? Oh look, the color came back to the turn, but why the slow-play there? LOL, I really take for a fish that one, and now I am caught by the old carpet overbet river. He believes that I have ever played or what? Hey, I bet that € 100k you got the flush, funny! Come on, I'll pay with my pair, but that's because it's Christmas ... HO HO HO! ...

Go even a hand. Ah, I just hit my flush, but it makes him whether he had full set. It goes even from river belt and if I pay with my crappy flush it might have suspected something ... By cons, if it is I who am carpet as if I had not seen the doublet, he will think he played well the blow ... HO HO HO! ...

Come on, I still give him a set over set, and then stop there. Well he can not complain about not being spoiled for Christmas, this one this year! HO HO HO! ...

[Big Fashion Voice OFF]

And now, my chick, it has pleased you my wonderful Christmas?
- I have not included Dad, but I'll have my presents?
- I do not think my grandfather, he can not do everything you know, Santa Claus. Maybe next year? "

Seriously, you see me do that to her?? No, of course, I myself will make him his presents under the tree, and I tell him that it is the Father Christmas has brought everything ... Tin, sometimes I am disgusted ...

Go, Merry Christmas to all!

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Tiberium Wars The Wizard Was Interrupted Before

OH OH, OH!