Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Dishwasher Grease Build Up

Less tournaments do not kill the tournament

A short little post for 3 reasons:

- It is super late and tomorrow I have a busy day
- Ca endlessly brag on this blog for some time, it bother me almost, so I will not make sandwiches either
- But I still can not go to bed without telling you about my win tonight :-)

few days ago I was wondering if the example of famous bloggers, that playing fewer tournaments did not lead to better results. So the fact is that I'm much less in the MTT Earlier this month (12 tournaments played very accurately, including satellites, when I was usually around 20 at the same time in previous months). Until then, RAS, 3 itm in cartons, the routine what.

And tonight I'm making for the 3rd time this month that 50 € in which I had reached the 2nd place last month ... And that's not ty-six hours after I ship the tournament to win € 2,329, which admit it's always good to take.

It was, as often happens when you win a tournament grassouille well, in which more than happy pussy few spots like this shot at 40 left when my A9 on a flop vs J8 J108 ends Color runner runner, and in which coin flips fall more often on the right side and can fatten on the backs of shorts (Fred, if you read me ... I sell the method ;-)).

It was also an end of tournament play well controlled with very aggressive when I took the chip lead early in the semifinals. I had to drop to 3 left a big mistake that I thought she was going to cost me a victory, however, promised (I had more chips than my two opponents combined). Never good to double barrel bluff a board when the opponent has A44A As (he laughs again). But I held out and the game was long and 3-balanced. It finally my future opponent HU exiting the third player, making me fear a difficult HU with approximately 1 / 3 of the chips to start ... It was also difficult, and if by chance my opponent reads me, Féloche him for the good fight to the end of which I only won that because the cards were definitely on my side tonight .. .

I wonder if I'm not going to play less, me ...

Like many certainly do not come back on comments from previous articles, I would rest a question open to cash-game players experienced. As noted by one commentator, I call on rates 3bet is low (23% since the beginning of the year). This is not a bad NL100 but will probably be the upper limits.

My question is simple: What issues should be preferred to expand the range? For now, I take little risk of being dominated when I touch, since I do not call that small pp and sc, and only in position (in all other cases, I choose between fold and 4-bet) . Should he make the play as OOP, or should it focus on expanding the position to other hands the range of IP call?

Finally this short post I can not resist the pleasure of sharing with you the little ditty that I commented out this great talent in what Rincewind tribute to his post the day already legendary.
Challenge100K said ...

Enormous, really excellent! And it is a true lover of Brassens speaking.

I want to tell you:

It's yours, this song
Thou Rincewind who unceremoniously
With talent made me laugh when
variance f'sait you suffer
You who don ' point when you're lamented
The crisp and crunchy
All people in well-to d'sous l'EV
wept to see bad beat
It was just a great delusion
But he had heated body
And in my soul still burns
In the manner of a burst of laughter
Thou Rincewind when you earn
That goodrun Whether you return
lead in NL Holdem
To gain eternal ...

0 comments:

Post a Comment